Algorithmization and Ethics: Transformation of pr in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

N. Hrytsiuta

Abstract


The purpose of this article is to examine the current concepts of «algorithmic PR» and trace the evolution of key ethical guidelines that are being formed in the process of implementing the regulatory policy of the European Union, in particular, through the prism of the EU AI Act.

Research methodology. The methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization, and case studies were chosen as the main approaches to the research. To achieve the goal, a set of methods was applied: analysis of scientific concepts and ethical problems of integrating AI into PR; case studies to illustrate the integration of AI into the ethical and deontological framework of PR communications, identifying the boundary between effective algorithmization and manipulative practices, as well as strategies for using AI in the context of digitalization; synthesis to integrate case study conclusions, generalize information, and identify key trends in the PR industry; generalization to systematize data, formulate conclusions regarding the consequences of implementing AI, and provide recommendations. This approach allowed us to obtain a structured picture of current trends in the PR sphere and assess the ethical challenges that AI poses to social communications specialists.

Results. Based on the analysis of the latest reports of the European Communication Monitor and the works of leading scientists (A. Zerfass, О. Ihlen, A. Buhmann, F. Likely, L. Dühring, K. Berger, etc.), it has been proven that the integration of AI into PR is a profound transformation that requires a rethinking of professional values and the formation of a new ethical paradigm. This study focuses on the use of generative artificial intelligence by public relations professionals, highlighting its benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations based on empirical experience. It was found that PR specialists are actively integrating AI into professional activities, developing strategies that involve not only technological adaptation, but also a deep rethinking of the role of communication in shaping the digital space. The results highlight the key benefits and common challenges of using FDI in public relations practice. In addition, the study revealed various ethical problems identified by specialists in connection with the implementation of AI, identified key ethical dilemmas in the use of artificial intelligence, in particular regarding misinformation and false information, manipulation and hidden influence, intellectual property and professional identity. The main reason for their occurrence is the insufficient algorithmic literacy of PR specialists, as well as outdated ethical codes that require rethinking and refinement in accordance with the requirements of the times.

The scientific novelty consists in the systematization of the risks of the algorithmization of communications and the determination of the role of the PR specialist as an ethical verifier of reality in the «post-truth society».

Practical significance. The research findings can be used to develop national strategies for the development of the PR industry in Ukraine, taking into account the specifics of the domestic information space.

Key words: public relations, artificial intelligence, algorithmization, communication ethics, European school of PR, EU AI Act, strategic communications, disinformation.


References


5 PR trends for 2025: The evolving communication landscape. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2025-ai-pr-trends-pr%C3%A9cis-ai-wuehe [in English].

Avnoon, N. & Eyal, G. (2025). It’s not a bug, it’s a feature: How AI experts and data scientists account for the opacity of algorithms. doi: 10.1177/03063127251364509 [in English].

Buhmann, A. & Likely, F. (2022). The algorithmic turn in public relations. In J. Falkheimer & H. Heide (Eds.), Research Handbook on Strategic Communication (pp. 312–326). Bristol: Ed-ward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/research-handbook-on-strategic-communication-9781800379886.html?srsltid=AfmBOoqyutS3A-58G6XhYnXEE7duZHHjl19FQFUyIn55q0KUk7yxwkLu [in English].

Collister, S. (2024). Algorithmic public relations: Materiality, technology and power in a post-hegemonic world’. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/12232072/Algorithmic_Public_Relations_Materiality_Technology_and_Power_in_a_Post_Hegemonic_World [in English].

Farrell, R. (2026). From algorithms to audiences: How PR pros can win in the age of AI. Re-trieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-algorithms-audiences-how-pr-pros-can-win-age-ai-robert-farrell-yisvf/ [in English].

Gandini, A., Keeling, S, & Reviglio, U. (2025). Conceptualising the ‘algorithmic public opinion’: Public opinion formation in the digital age. doi: 10.1177/29768640251323147 [in English].

How algorithms and public relations (PR) Strategies influence and shape editorial decision-making in con-temporary media, and the ethical considerations associated with these influences. Retrieved from https://apaxresearchers.com/how-do-algorithms-and-public-relations-pr-strategies-inuence-and-shape-editorial-decision-making-in-contemporary-me-dia#:~:text=Algorithms%20have%20become%20the%20de,judgment%20and%20data%2Ddriven%20strategies [in English].

Ihlen, О. & Pallas, J. (2014). Mediatization of corporations. Retrieved from https://oyvindihlen.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/preprint-mediatization-of-corporations1.pdf [in English].

Louie, Е. (2025). The «Black box» problems. Retrieved from http://medium.com/@humansforai/the-black-box-problem-c40d3c6f26fe#:~:text=As%20AI%20constantly%20advances%2C%20it,impact%20while%20meeting%20regulatory%20standards [in English].

Miller, J. (2026). How 2026’s biggest PR challenges are also its biggest opportunities. Retrieved from https://thecyphersagency.com/how-2026s-biggest-pr-challenges-are-also-its-biggest-opportunities/ [in English].

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and in-formation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x0hch [in English].

Phillips, D. (2024). Augmenting public relations: An introduction to AI and other technologies for PR. CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781003507901 [in English].

Social media algorithms and the future of PR measurement. (2025). WCFA. Retrieved from https://www.wcfaglobal.com/news/198/social-media-algorithms-and-the-future-of-pr-measure-ment#:~:text=In%20today’s%20fast%2Dpaced%20digital,content%20resonates%20with%20target%20audiences [in English].

Torossian, R. (2025). Algorithms and earned media: Where tech PR meets digital perfor-mance. Retrieved from https://influenceonline.co.uk/2025/05/16/algorithms-and-earned-media-where-tech-pr-meets-digital-perfor-mance#:~:text=For%20decades%2C%20PR%20professionals%20have,feedback%20from%20journalists%20and%20audiences [in English].

Uricchio, W. (2011). The algorithmic turn: Photosynth, augmented reality and the changing implications of the image. doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2011.548486 [in English].

Zerfass, A., & Link, J. (2023). Business models for communication departments: a compre-hensive approach to analyzing, explaining and innovating communication management in or-ganizations. Journal of Communication Management, 28(2/3). doi: 10.1108/JCOM-02-2023-0027 [in English].

Zerfass, A., Dühring, L., & Berger, K. (2020). Redesigning communications. Five steps toward an agile communications department (Communication Insights, Issue 8). Leipzig, Germany: Academic Society for Management & Communication. Retrieved from https://www.akademische-gesellschaft.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/communication-insights-issue-8.pdf [in German].

Zerfass, A., et al. (Annual reports): European Communication Monitor. Managing tensions in corporate communications in the context of geopolitical crises, artificial intelligence, and man-agerial learning. Retrieved from https://www. communicationmonitor.eu [in English].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2026.2(66).2

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Since 2013, all electronic versions of the journal are stored in the National Library of Ukraine named after VI Vernadsky of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and presented on the portal in the information resource "Scientific Periodicals of Ukraine".

Indexing of the journal in scientometric databases:

The publication is indexed by Citefactor: 2019/2020: 4,54.

The journal is indexed by Google Scholar.

In 2020, the journal was included in the Index Copernicus.

The journal is indexed by Innospace Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF): 2016: 5,899, 2017: 6,435, 2018: 7,037, 2019: 7,431

From 2020, the collection is indexed by ResearchBib.

Journal included in the PKP Index.